AI search visibility, measured

Get named by AI. Then prove it.

Ansengine runs your buyers’ questions across all seven answer engines, shows the share of answers that name you, finds who gets cited instead, and stages every fix for your approval.

OpenAI
Perplexity
Google
Gemini
Claude

70 real answers · no card · we email you when it lands

Sample data · demo brand
Overview
named in AI answers
34%

likely 27% to 42% · answers that mention Dateworthy

own site cited as source
22%

31 of 140 answers link dateworthy.co

answers measured
140

20 runs per engine

engines live
7

measured natively

Named rate by engine

share of answers naming Dateworthy, per engine

OpenAI
ChatGPT
60% · 12/20
OpenAI
ChatGPT (consumer app)
35% · 7/20
Perplexity
Perplexity
45% · 9/20
Google
Google AI Overview
30% · 6/20
Gemini
Gemini
30% · 6/20
Google
Google AI Mode
25% · 5/20
Claude
Claude
15% · 3/20
best AI dating photo serviceare AI dating photos worth itPhotofeeler vs AI photo toolshow to get better Hinge photos

Measured natively, engine by engine

OpenAI
ChatGPT
OpenAI
ChatGPT (consumer app)
Perplexity
Perplexity
Google
Google AI Overview
Google
Google AI Mode
Gemini
Gemini
Claude
Claude
Grok
Grok

7 answer engines

ChatGPT, ChatGPT (consumer app), Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, measured natively and localized when your buyer is local.

No invented numbers

Every figure traces to a real captured answer and ships with its sample size and an honest range, so you always know when a change is real and when it is noise.

The whole loop

Measure → diagnose → fix → prove. Not a score you read. Work that gets done, with receipts.

Global + local

Buyer prompts worldwide and the Google Maps pack block-by-block on a geo-grid. We run both lanes on one subject.

One platform · two jobs

Agencies win clients. Brands win answers.

AI search is quietly rewriting how buyers choose, and most businesses have no idea they have dropped out of it. Agencies use Ansengine to find those businesses and close them with proof. Brands and in-house SEO and AEO teams use the same loop on their own name: measure, fix, prove, defend the budget.

01 · Acquire · for agencies

Find the businesses AI ignores.

Name a vertical and a metro. Ansengine surfaces the businesses that rank on Google but are missing from AI answers, proven with the verbatim answer naming their competitors instead. Each prospect lands scored for closeability, with a deliverability-checked public contact route. You forward the proof, book the call, close the retainer. Do-not-contact lists are checked before anything is ever sent.

Agency plans only. Prospecting is how agencies find clients, so it is not sold to brand tiers.

Ansengine · AcquireSample data
Specimen · scan #D-0132
Lakeview Dental Studio
Austin, TX · 4.8★ · 312 reviews · ranks #2 in the Maps pack
83
Pitchability
never named by AIP1 · pitch firstsend-safe ✓
The receipt · Google AI Overviews

“The top implant dentists in Austin include Apex Dental Specialists, Nuhope Implant Center and Austin Dental Implant Center…”

Lakeview Dental is not mentioned in any of the 12 captured answers.

Highest-leverage fixes
  1. 01 · Earn the Healthgrades + RealSelf listings AI cites
  2. 02 · Publish the All-on-4 answer-first service page
  3. 03 · Unblock PerplexityBot in robots.txt
Contact route · deliverability-checked
Dr. Maya Chen · Owner
maya@lakeviewdental.example · verified
Forward the answer that proves it, book the call.

02 · Deliver · brands and agencies

Become the answer, and prove it.

Track presence across every engine: multi-run, with the sample size and an honest range on every rate, globally and on the local map grid. Pulse tells you what changed and what it is worth, drafts the fix, and stages it for approval. After the work, the prove loop re-measures and calls it a win only when the math says it is real, never on a vanity bump. In-house teams defend the budget with that report. Agencies renew the retainer on it.

Ansengine · DiagnoseSample data
best dentist in austin
Perplexity
Perplexity

Apex Dental Specialists wins it via reddit.com/r/Austin

+18
pts
fixPost a disclosed, genuinely useful answer on the live r/Austin thread
dental implants austin cost
Gemini
Gemini

Nuhope Implant Center wins it via healthgrades.com

+14
pts
fixClaim the profile and earn 8 fresh Healthgrades reviews
all-on-4 implants austin
OpenAI
ChatGPT

Apex Dental Specialists wins it via youtube.com

+11
pts
fixPublish an honest All-on-4 walkthrough with pricing

The loop · what each stage hands you

Don’t monitor a score. Move it, and prove you did.

Here is the whole loop on one sample brand, with the numbers your client, or your own boardroom, actually sees. The same surfaces are live in the demo above.

01 · Measure

34%

of AI answers name Dateworthy

likely 27% to 42%, from 140 answers: 7 engines, 20 runs each. Named and cited are tracked separately, because a site can be cited as a source and still never be the name AI recommends.

02 · Diagnose

61%

of answers name Photofeeler instead

Plus the exact threads, lists and reviews the engines cite, with counts, and whether the AI crawlers can even read your site.

03 · Fix

3

fixes drafted, staged for approval

Answer-first pages, list placements, crawler unblocks: each drafted with receipts attached. Nothing ever publishes without you.

04 · Prove

34% → 56%

22 more answers in every 100

Re-measured 6 weeks later, 140 answers each side. The two ranges do not overlap, so the lift is real, not noise. That is the report a client renews on and a boardroom funds.

Sample data · Dateworthy is a demo brand · our own real baseline: houseofmvps.com, 583 runs, published unedited

Meet Pulse · what makes us different

Don’t read a dashboard. Ask your analyst.

Every other AI-visibility tool hands you charts and leaves the thinking to you. Pulse is a chat-first analyst: ask what changed, why a competitor wins, or what to fix, and it answers from your measured data and then does the work. Drafts the page, finds the sources, stages the fix for one-click approval.

Wakes on every refresh: with what changed and what it's worth, never a wall of charts.

Refuses to alarm on noise: a change is real only when the ranges stop overlapping.

Ends in a drafted fix: staged for approval. Nothing publishes without you.

A generic chatbot

  • Can’t see your prompts, engines or grid
  • Invents competitor names and percentages
  • No sample sizes, no receipts, no fix

Pulse, grounded in your data

  • Reads your real measured answers, run by run
  • Every number carries its range and sample size
  • Ends in a drafted fix, staged for approval
Pulseyour AI-visibility analystSample data
Which prompts am I losing, and to whom?

You are named in 10 of 48 answers on your buyer prompts. The biggest gap is “best dentist in austin” on Perplexity: Apex Dental takes it from an r/Austin thread you are absent from. I have drafted the answer. I will not put a number on the lift until the prove loop re-measures it.

Disclosed r/Austin answer drafted · approve to ship

Pulse answers only from your measured data · no invented numbers

Start with a free baseline.

70 real answers across every engine your plan runs. No card.

Get my free report

Prove

Show the lift. Make the renewal obvious.

After the work ships, Ansengine waits for each engine to re-read the web, re-measures, and calls it a win only when the numbers separate beyond doubt. Agencies send the white-label before/after link to the client; in-house teams send it straight to the CMO. That is how retainers, and budgets, renew.

Start with your free baseline
Ansengine · ProveSample data
FixShare of appearanceVerdict
Reddit r/Austin answer
Perplexity
Perplexity
21%39%
n=120 · intervals separate
confirmed
Healthgrades reviews
OpenAI
ChatGPT
30%41%
n=400 · intervals separate
confirmed
GBP posts + Q&A
Gemini
Gemini
24%29%
n=200 · intervals overlap
measuring

Leads and revenue

Which leads did AI actually send you?

Nobody can click-attribute most AI answers: the assistant apps open links without a referrer, so the visit lands in your analytics as Direct. Every rival either stays silent about that or quietly promises a number it cannot produce. We answer it in three separate tiers, each labeled with what it can and cannot prove.

Tier 1 · Self-reported · strongest

29 of 47

leads named an AI assistant on your own signup form

24 of them arrived in a window where you were the named answer for the exact prompts they asked. That join is the receipt.

Tier 2 · Referral clicks · measured

38

conversions on 612 AI referral sessions

Straight from your GA4. Real, and a minority by nature, because most AI traffic never carries a referrer.

Tier 3 · Influenced · labeled

56%

named rate, likely 47% to 64%

How your measured presence moved while those leads arrived. Correlation shown with its range, never sold as causation.

One row from the ledger

Priya N. said ChatGPT, from /pricing

named answer for “best AI dating photo service” · ChatGPT 16/20named answer for “are AI dating photos worth it” · ChatGPT 12/20

Push the lead to HubSpot or Salesforce with that source attached, so the deal your CRM closes carries the AI answer that started it.

Global and local, one subject

A SaaS measures the world. A clinic measures the block.

Most tools make you choose. Ansengine runs both lanes on the same brand, so a national brand and a multi-location business are measured with the same rigor.

01

Worldwide buyer prompts

Track your category questions across engines and regions, and see how the answer changes market to market.

42 prompts tracked

02

Per-location AI and Maps grid

For local and multi-location brands, measure AI visibility per location plus the Google Maps pack block-by-block on a coordinate grid.

12 locations · 49-pin grid

03

Franchise variance, rolled up

One report shows which locations win, which lag, and the shared fix, so a franchise sees the whole network at a glance.

3 locations win the pack, 5 never appear

The whole surface

Everything between a number and a result.

A monitor tells you the score. These are the parts that change it, and they all ship today.

Classic Google, same prompts

Your Google position tracked daily beside AI presence. 11 prompts rank on Google but never appear in AI answers, which is the gap worth the most.

Why the site itself blocks you

Live bot-UA probes, raw-vs-rendered readability, robots findings. This sample: 1 crawler blocked, 4 pages non-indexable.

Publisher outreach that reaches a human

25 cited pages promoted to a pipeline, 14 editor contacts found, 9 pitches drafted from your verified facts. You send them, never us.

Alerts where you work

Slack and email the moment a lead lands or presence drops, plus the daily brief. Zapier and Make catch-hooks fan it anywhere else.

Your CRM and your sheets

HubSpot and Salesforce for leads, Google Sheets, CSV, White-label PDF for reporting. One-time OAuth through your own accounts.

24 MCP tools for your agents

Claude Code, Cursor, Claude and ChatGPT read your measured visibility directly. Writes cover only the reversible surface: an agent can never publish, send, or spend.

See every integration or read the API and MCP reference.

Who it is for

Two buyers. The same engine underneath.

For brands and in-house teams

Be the name AI recommends, and prove it paid.

Your buyers ask an assistant which product to choose and one name gets the click. You find out whether it is yours, on your real buyer questions, with the sample size attached. Then you find out what it was worth.

  • 34% of answers name you today, likely 27% to 42%. You will know the day that moves, and whether the move is real.
  • 29 of 47 leads told you an assistant sent them, joined to the exact prompts you won that month. That is the slide your CMO funds.
  • The fix, drafted: the page, the list placement, the crawler unblock, each staged for your approval. Nothing publishes on its own.
  • Local too: 12 locations and a 49-pin Maps grid if your buyer is on a block, not a browser.
See it for brands

For agencies and consultants

Win the client, do the work, renew on receipts.

You need three things a dashboard cannot give you: a reason the prospect replies, work you can bill, and proof at renewal. All three are the product.

  • Acquire finds AI-invisible businesses in any market and proves it with the verbatim answer naming their competitors. That is your opener.
  • White-label everything: your logo on the client report, a portfolio link across every client, and a quarterly review that writes itself.
  • Prove the retainer: before and after with separated ranges, on one link a client can read without you in the room.
  • Pooled across the book: prompts, seats and clients scale together, so a new logo does not mean a new plan.
See it for agencies

Why it closes · not a monitoring tool

Monitors score a brand. We hand you the work, and the deal.

The AI-visibility category is full of good dashboards: Profound, Peec, Otterly, Searchable. They report how a brand appears in AI answers, and leave the fixing, proving and client-finding to you. Agencies: open with the exact AI answer that names three competitors and not your prospect, and it stops being a pitch. It becomes a problem they want fixed. In-house SEO and AEO teams: the same receipts that close a client are the ones that defend your budget, with the before and after on one link your CMO can read.

AI-visibility monitors

  • Track the brand you point them at.
  • Report a score and a trend.
  • Show an average “position”, which is statistically invalid over sampled AI answers.
  • Leave the fixing, proving and client-finding to you.

Ansengine

  • Finds every AI-invisible business in a market: your next 50 prospects.
  • Hands you the verbatim answer naming competitors instead: proof you can forward.
  • Reports share of appearance with the sample size and an honest range. Never a fake rank.
  • Drafts the fix, stages it for approval, and proves the lift with receipts.

Open slots · the map, then the receipts

Every AEO tool can write content now. We know which answers content can win.

We classify every buyer question by which kind of source already owns its answer, then pick the lever that moves that kind. Which lever wins is decided by the pool, not by effort. Spray content into the wrong kind of pool and it wins nothing.

Own-site slots

No trusted list owns the answer. A category-declared page on your own site can become the cited answer. We draft it, export it to your CMS, then re-measure at the engine's propagation window.

Lever: the entity page

List slots

A best-of or directory owns the slot. We name the exact directories and listicles the engines cited for that pool, so placement goes where it counts.

Lever: placement

Knowledge slots

The engine answers from training, no retrieval at all. These move with brand mentions across the open web, the slowest lever and the one we are honest about.

Lever: mentions

Then the receipt: when a pool you were never recommended in flips to recommended, the taken-slot ledger dates it and puts it on the white-label report you send your client. Measured, period over period, never asserted.

Method · the honesty contract

Most of “AEO” is theater. Here is what we refuse to do.

No rank positions. An “average position” over sampled AI answers is statistically invalid. We report share of appearance with the sample size and an honest range, and say so on every report.

No branded inflation. Prompts that name you guarantee a mention. They're measured separately and never blended into your competitive rate.

No sample inflation. A retried measurement can never double-count. The sample size on the report is the real one.

No invented sources. Pulse and every draft cite only measured answers and verified facts. If the data doesn't exist, it says what to measure. It never guesses.

No auto-publishing. Every fix is staged for human approval, and ships with a receipt when you approve it.

No dead tactics. llms.txt is not a ranking lever and schema alone is hygiene, not a citation strategy. We'll tell you which popular advice is theater, before you pay anyone for it.

Read the full methodology

Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when the report pays for itself.

The free report is a real baseline: 70 measured answers, no card. Plans scale prompts, brands and seats, never honesty: every tier gets the same statistics and the same 7 engines. Grok is the one exception, on enterprise, because its answers cost about seven times a typical engine run.

Try

Feel the full depth on one business.

$49/mo

Billed monthly

Start free
  • 1 business
  • 1 location
  • 1 seat

Includes:

  • All 7 AI engines, multi-run with intervals
  • Honest ranges on every rate
  • 100 tracked prompts
  • Weekly refresh
  • Source and citation graph
  • Get Cited targets with contacts
  • 1 location, measured on its own answers
Most popular

Growth

The brand sweet spot.

$99/mo

Billed monthly

Start free
  • 3 businesses
  • 5 locations
  • 3 seats

Everything in Try, plus:

  • Daily refresh
  • 300 tracked prompts per business
  • PROVE receipts, CI-gated
  • Revenue attribution (GA4 + GSC)
  • Ranked fix queue, drafted for approval
  • Local Maps grid, pin by pin
  • JSON-LD schema generator
  • API and MCP access

Scale

Portfolio, franchise, white-label.

$199/mo

Billed monthly

Start free
  • 10 businesses
  • 25 locations
  • 8 seats

Everything in Growth, plus:

  • Franchise variance rollup
  • Channels: earn vs buy
  • Competitive report
  • White-label client reports

Pro

Scale on the platform underneath you.

$399/mo

Billed monthly

Start free
  • 25 businesses
  • 75 locations
  • 20 seats

Everything in Scale, plus:

  • 500 tracked prompts per business

Enterprise

Your whole footprint, governed. Custom above the floor.

from$799/mo
Talk to us
Unlimited businesses25 locations per businessUnlimited seats

Everything in Pro, plus:

  • Audit logs
  • SLA and dedicated CSM
  • Guided onboarding
  • Custom billing terms

Compare every plan

Accuracy is identical on every row of the first group. What you buy as you climb is scope and the outcome layer, never a better measurement.

Capability
Try
$49
Growth
$99
Scale
$199
Pro
$399
Enterprise
from $799
Measurement & accuracy
AI engines trackedAll 7All 7All 7All 7All 8, incl. Grok
Monthly engine allowance$4$9$19$39$79
Honest ranges on every rate
Refresh cadenceWeeklyDailyDailyDailyDaily
Source & citation graph
Pulse copilot questions / mo503007501,5005,000
Coverage
Businesses tracked131025Unlimited
Locations tracked (max 25 per business)152575Unlimited
Tracked prompts / business1003003005002,000
Team seats13820Unlimited
Local & franchise
Per-location AI answers
Local Maps grid (pin-by-pin)
JSON-LD schema generator
Franchise variance rollup
Outcomes & actions
Get Cited targets + contacts
Ranked fix queue
Revenue attribution (GA4 + GSC)
PROVE receipts (CI-gated)
Competitive report
Channels (earn vs buy)
White-label reports
Platform & support
Data exports (CSV)
API + MCP access
SLA + dedicated CSM
SupportCommunityEmailEmailPriorityDedicated
Start free Start free Start free Start free Talk to us

Every plan gets every engine, multi-run with honest ranges, the source graph, the copilot, drafted fixes, and CI-gated PROVE that ties a citation to the revenue it moved. You scale businesses, locations and clients, never capability or accuracy. Depth is bounded by a monthly engine-spend allowance per tier, not by a per-prompt meter.

FAQ

Asked by agencies & founders.

How is this different from Profound, Peec, Otterly or Searchable?+

They monitor: you get a score and a trend for the brand you point them at. Ansengine runs the whole loop: measure with confidence intervals, diagnose the exact sources engines cite instead of you, draft the fix, and prove the lift with receipts. For agencies it also finds the next clients (Acquire). We have not found another tool that ships a local map grid and a prospecting engine in the same product; check ours against theirs.

Are the numbers real or estimated?+

Real, always. Every rate comes from captured engine answers, carries its sample size and a Wilson 95% confidence interval, and a retried run can never inflate the numbers. We never report a rank position for AI answers (it is statistically invalid over repeated runs), and we never blend branded prompts into your competitive rate.

What exactly is free?+

The visibility report: a real baseline of engine answers across your buyer prompts on every engine we run, with the competitors AI names instead of you and the sources those answers cite. No card. If it says 0%, that is the truth, and the reason to fix it.

Does anything publish automatically?+

No. Pulse drafts pages, outreach and fixes; everything is staged for your approval and nothing ships without you. Approved work publishes with a receipt, and the prove loop re-measures once the engines have had time to re-read the web.

I run an agency. What does white-label mean here?+

Client reports carry your logo and your link. You run a roster of brands under one login, each with its own measurements, fixes and receipts. Acquire hands you scored prospects with the verbatim AI answer that proves the problem, plus a public contact route we deliverability-check and screen against do-not-contact lists.

Global brand or local business: which is this for?+

Both, in one subject. A SaaS measures its buyer prompts worldwide; a dental clinic measures the same AND its Google Maps rank block-by-block on a coordinate grid (Share of Local Voice). Agencies mix both on one roster.

Free visibility report · no card · we email you when it lands

Your buyers already asked. See whose name AI said.

A real baseline across every engine we run, for your clients or your own brand: your share of appearance, the competitors named instead, and the exact sources to earn. If it’s 0%, you’ll know, and you’ll know what to do about it.