AI search visibility, measured
Ansengine runs your buyers’ questions across all seven answer engines, shows the share of answers that name you, finds who gets cited instead, and stages every fix for your approval.
likely 27% to 42% · answers that mention Dateworthy
31 of 140 answers link dateworthy.co
20 runs per engine
measured natively
share of answers naming Dateworthy, per engine
Measured natively, engine by engine
ChatGPT, ChatGPT (consumer app), Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Claude, measured natively and localized when your buyer is local.
Every figure traces to a real captured answer and ships with its sample size and an honest range, so you always know when a change is real and when it is noise.
Measure → diagnose → fix → prove. Not a score you read. Work that gets done, with receipts.
Buyer prompts worldwide and the Google Maps pack block-by-block on a geo-grid. We run both lanes on one subject.
One platform · two jobs
AI search is quietly rewriting how buyers choose, and most businesses have no idea they have dropped out of it. Agencies use Ansengine to find those businesses and close them with proof. Brands and in-house SEO and AEO teams use the same loop on their own name: measure, fix, prove, defend the budget.
01 · Acquire · for agencies
Name a vertical and a metro. Ansengine surfaces the businesses that rank on Google but are missing from AI answers, proven with the verbatim answer naming their competitors instead. Each prospect lands scored for closeability, with a deliverability-checked public contact route. You forward the proof, book the call, close the retainer. Do-not-contact lists are checked before anything is ever sent.
Agency plans only. Prospecting is how agencies find clients, so it is not sold to brand tiers.
“The top implant dentists in Austin include Apex Dental Specialists, Nuhope Implant Center and Austin Dental Implant Center…”
Lakeview Dental is not mentioned in any of the 12 captured answers.
02 · Deliver · brands and agencies
Track presence across every engine: multi-run, with the sample size and an honest range on every rate, globally and on the local map grid. Pulse tells you what changed and what it is worth, drafts the fix, and stages it for approval. After the work, the prove loop re-measures and calls it a win only when the math says it is real, never on a vanity bump. In-house teams defend the budget with that report. Agencies renew the retainer on it.
Apex Dental Specialists wins it via reddit.com/r/Austin
Nuhope Implant Center wins it via healthgrades.com
Apex Dental Specialists wins it via youtube.com
The loop · what each stage hands you
Here is the whole loop on one sample brand, with the numbers your client, or your own boardroom, actually sees. The same surfaces are live in the demo above.
01 · Measure
34%
of AI answers name Dateworthy
likely 27% to 42%, from 140 answers: 7 engines, 20 runs each. Named and cited are tracked separately, because a site can be cited as a source and still never be the name AI recommends.
02 · Diagnose
61%
of answers name Photofeeler instead
Plus the exact threads, lists and reviews the engines cite, with counts, and whether the AI crawlers can even read your site.
03 · Fix
3
fixes drafted, staged for approval
Answer-first pages, list placements, crawler unblocks: each drafted with receipts attached. Nothing ever publishes without you.
04 · Prove
34% → 56%
22 more answers in every 100
Re-measured 6 weeks later, 140 answers each side. The two ranges do not overlap, so the lift is real, not noise. That is the report a client renews on and a boardroom funds.
Sample data · Dateworthy is a demo brand · our own real baseline: houseofmvps.com, 583 runs, published unedited
Meet Pulse · what makes us different
Every other AI-visibility tool hands you charts and leaves the thinking to you. Pulse is a chat-first analyst: ask what changed, why a competitor wins, or what to fix, and it answers from your measured data and then does the work. Drafts the page, finds the sources, stages the fix for one-click approval.
Wakes on every refresh: with what changed and what it's worth, never a wall of charts.
Refuses to alarm on noise: a change is real only when the ranges stop overlapping.
Ends in a drafted fix: staged for approval. Nothing publishes without you.
A generic chatbot
Pulse, grounded in your data
You are named in 10 of 48 answers on your buyer prompts. The biggest gap is “best dentist in austin” on Perplexity: Apex Dental takes it from an r/Austin thread you are absent from. I have drafted the answer. I will not put a number on the lift until the prove loop re-measures it.
Pulse answers only from your measured data · no invented numbers
70 real answers across every engine your plan runs. No card.
Prove
After the work ships, Ansengine waits for each engine to re-read the web, re-measures, and calls it a win only when the numbers separate beyond doubt. Agencies send the white-label before/after link to the client; in-house teams send it straight to the CMO. That is how retainers, and budgets, renew.
Start with your free baselineLeads and revenue
Nobody can click-attribute most AI answers: the assistant apps open links without a referrer, so the visit lands in your analytics as Direct. Every rival either stays silent about that or quietly promises a number it cannot produce. We answer it in three separate tiers, each labeled with what it can and cannot prove.
Tier 1 · Self-reported · strongest
29 of 47
leads named an AI assistant on your own signup form
24 of them arrived in a window where you were the named answer for the exact prompts they asked. That join is the receipt.
Tier 2 · Referral clicks · measured
38
conversions on 612 AI referral sessions
Straight from your GA4. Real, and a minority by nature, because most AI traffic never carries a referrer.
Tier 3 · Influenced · labeled
56%
named rate, likely 47% to 64%
How your measured presence moved while those leads arrived. Correlation shown with its range, never sold as causation.
One row from the ledger
Priya N. said ChatGPT, from /pricing
Push the lead to HubSpot or Salesforce with that source attached, so the deal your CRM closes carries the AI answer that started it.
Global and local, one subject
Most tools make you choose. Ansengine runs both lanes on the same brand, so a national brand and a multi-location business are measured with the same rigor.
01
Track your category questions across engines and regions, and see how the answer changes market to market.
42 prompts tracked
02
For local and multi-location brands, measure AI visibility per location plus the Google Maps pack block-by-block on a coordinate grid.
12 locations · 49-pin grid
03
One report shows which locations win, which lag, and the shared fix, so a franchise sees the whole network at a glance.
3 locations win the pack, 5 never appear
The whole surface
A monitor tells you the score. These are the parts that change it, and they all ship today.
Your Google position tracked daily beside AI presence. 11 prompts rank on Google but never appear in AI answers, which is the gap worth the most.
Live bot-UA probes, raw-vs-rendered readability, robots findings. This sample: 1 crawler blocked, 4 pages non-indexable.
25 cited pages promoted to a pipeline, 14 editor contacts found, 9 pitches drafted from your verified facts. You send them, never us.
Slack and email the moment a lead lands or presence drops, plus the daily brief. Zapier and Make catch-hooks fan it anywhere else.
HubSpot and Salesforce for leads, Google Sheets, CSV, White-label PDF for reporting. One-time OAuth through your own accounts.
Claude Code, Cursor, Claude and ChatGPT read your measured visibility directly. Writes cover only the reversible surface: an agent can never publish, send, or spend.
Who it is for
For brands and in-house teams
Your buyers ask an assistant which product to choose and one name gets the click. You find out whether it is yours, on your real buyer questions, with the sample size attached. Then you find out what it was worth.
For agencies and consultants
You need three things a dashboard cannot give you: a reason the prospect replies, work you can bill, and proof at renewal. All three are the product.
Why it closes · not a monitoring tool
The AI-visibility category is full of good dashboards: Profound, Peec, Otterly, Searchable. They report how a brand appears in AI answers, and leave the fixing, proving and client-finding to you. Agencies: open with the exact AI answer that names three competitors and not your prospect, and it stops being a pitch. It becomes a problem they want fixed. In-house SEO and AEO teams: the same receipts that close a client are the ones that defend your budget, with the before and after on one link your CMO can read.
AI-visibility monitors
Ansengine
Open slots · the map, then the receipts
We classify every buyer question by which kind of source already owns its answer, then pick the lever that moves that kind. Which lever wins is decided by the pool, not by effort. Spray content into the wrong kind of pool and it wins nothing.
No trusted list owns the answer. A category-declared page on your own site can become the cited answer. We draft it, export it to your CMS, then re-measure at the engine's propagation window.
Lever: the entity page
A best-of or directory owns the slot. We name the exact directories and listicles the engines cited for that pool, so placement goes where it counts.
Lever: placement
The engine answers from training, no retrieval at all. These move with brand mentions across the open web, the slowest lever and the one we are honest about.
Lever: mentions
Then the receipt: when a pool you were never recommended in flips to recommended, the taken-slot ledger dates it and puts it on the white-label report you send your client. Measured, period over period, never asserted.
Method · the honesty contract
No rank positions. An “average position” over sampled AI answers is statistically invalid. We report share of appearance with the sample size and an honest range, and say so on every report.
No branded inflation. Prompts that name you guarantee a mention. They're measured separately and never blended into your competitive rate.
No sample inflation. A retried measurement can never double-count. The sample size on the report is the real one.
No invented sources. Pulse and every draft cite only measured answers and verified facts. If the data doesn't exist, it says what to measure. It never guesses.
No auto-publishing. Every fix is staged for human approval, and ships with a receipt when you approve it.
No dead tactics. llms.txt is not a ranking lever and schema alone is hygiene, not a citation strategy. We'll tell you which popular advice is theater, before you pay anyone for it.
Pricing
The free report is a real baseline: 70 measured answers, no card. Plans scale prompts, brands and seats, never honesty: every tier gets the same statistics and the same 7 engines. Grok is the one exception, on enterprise, because its answers cost about seven times a typical engine run.
Feel the full depth on one business.
Billed monthly
Start freeIncludes:
The brand sweet spot.
Billed monthly
Start freeEverything in Try, plus:
Portfolio, franchise, white-label.
Billed monthly
Start freeEverything in Growth, plus:
Scale on the platform underneath you.
Billed monthly
Start freeEverything in Scale, plus:
Everything in Pro, plus:
Accuracy is identical on every row of the first group. What you buy as you climb is scope and the outcome layer, never a better measurement.
| Capability | Try $49 | Growth $99 | Scale $199 | Pro $399 | Enterprise from $799 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurement & accuracy | |||||
| AI engines tracked | All 7 | All 7 | All 7 | All 7 | All 8, incl. Grok |
| Monthly engine allowance | $4 | $9 | $19 | $39 | $79 |
| Honest ranges on every rate | |||||
| Refresh cadence | Weekly | Daily | Daily | Daily | Daily |
| Source & citation graph | |||||
| Pulse copilot questions / mo | 50 | 300 | 750 | 1,500 | 5,000 |
| Coverage | |||||
| Businesses tracked | 1 | 3 | 10 | 25 | Unlimited |
| Locations tracked (max 25 per business) | 1 | 5 | 25 | 75 | Unlimited |
| Tracked prompts / business | 100 | 300 | 300 | 500 | 2,000 |
| Team seats | 1 | 3 | 8 | 20 | Unlimited |
| Local & franchise | |||||
| Per-location AI answers | |||||
| Local Maps grid (pin-by-pin) | — | ||||
| JSON-LD schema generator | |||||
| Franchise variance rollup | |||||
| Outcomes & actions | |||||
| Get Cited targets + contacts | |||||
| Ranked fix queue | — | ||||
| Revenue attribution (GA4 + GSC) | — | ||||
| PROVE receipts (CI-gated) | |||||
| Competitive report | |||||
| Channels (earn vs buy) | |||||
| White-label reports | |||||
| Platform & support | |||||
| Data exports (CSV) | |||||
| API + MCP access | — | ||||
| SLA + dedicated CSM | — | — | — | — | |
| Support | Community | Priority | Dedicated | ||
| Start free | Start free | Start free | Start free | Talk to us | |
Every plan gets every engine, multi-run with honest ranges, the source graph, the copilot, drafted fixes, and CI-gated PROVE that ties a citation to the revenue it moved. You scale businesses, locations and clients, never capability or accuracy. Depth is bounded by a monthly engine-spend allowance per tier, not by a per-prompt meter.
FAQ
They monitor: you get a score and a trend for the brand you point them at. Ansengine runs the whole loop: measure with confidence intervals, diagnose the exact sources engines cite instead of you, draft the fix, and prove the lift with receipts. For agencies it also finds the next clients (Acquire). We have not found another tool that ships a local map grid and a prospecting engine in the same product; check ours against theirs.
Real, always. Every rate comes from captured engine answers, carries its sample size and a Wilson 95% confidence interval, and a retried run can never inflate the numbers. We never report a rank position for AI answers (it is statistically invalid over repeated runs), and we never blend branded prompts into your competitive rate.
The visibility report: a real baseline of engine answers across your buyer prompts on every engine we run, with the competitors AI names instead of you and the sources those answers cite. No card. If it says 0%, that is the truth, and the reason to fix it.
No. Pulse drafts pages, outreach and fixes; everything is staged for your approval and nothing ships without you. Approved work publishes with a receipt, and the prove loop re-measures once the engines have had time to re-read the web.
Client reports carry your logo and your link. You run a roster of brands under one login, each with its own measurements, fixes and receipts. Acquire hands you scored prospects with the verbatim AI answer that proves the problem, plus a public contact route we deliverability-check and screen against do-not-contact lists.
Both, in one subject. A SaaS measures its buyer prompts worldwide; a dental clinic measures the same AND its Google Maps rank block-by-block on a coordinate grid (Share of Local Voice). Agencies mix both on one roster.
Free visibility report · no card · we email you when it lands
A real baseline across every engine we run, for your clients or your own brand: your share of appearance, the competitors named instead, and the exact sources to earn. If it’s 0%, you’ll know, and you’ll know what to do about it.